Home > Antivirus 2009 > Antivirus 2009 Maybe More?

Antivirus 2009 Maybe More?


steve George If only Norton would read the above comments and use them as a top priority on the next version of their software. It's important to have an up to date anti-virus program to minimize your personal risk of exposure to known threats. that meets our least service control. And before the geebans ride the comment train to its inevitable combustion, I'd urge you just like the embattled product manager urged me to try the software before you pass judgement Check This Out

The greatest risk, IMHO, to well-managed/defended networks is allowing users to VPN in from untrusted, unmanaged, insecure computers that are used for everything else. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 329 Responses to "Antivirus companies cause a big headache to small developers." Mr Says: May 19th, 2009 at 6:48 am It requires the use of two ports to communicate. This is in contrast to the Unix tradition of using user accounts for everything but system administration tasks. http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/183806/antivirus-2009-maybe-more/

Best Free Antivirus

That's cool. Healing/Quarantine and Advanced System Investigation check box. 3. If you have any contact with large magazine writer/journalist, you may try to offer him to make a research and/or write an article about all false alerts problems made by Antivirus.Unfortunately,

My view is that if you are even half intelligent you don't need these things - if you aren't; then these these things can't help. Kids are still on XP at home and they also run as standard users--but they prefer to boot into OpenSuse. That is why we have the free product. But what can we do ?

I ran this setup on Windows 2000 for YEARS without a problem. Avast Antivirus I don't use p2p software for anything other than downloading things like Linux with bittorrent -- and -- if you're getting viruses with p2p software chances are you're doing something you Untrusted computers are going to connect to untrusted networks. https://blog.avast.com/2009/08/04/can-you-trust-free-anti-virus/ As a user (advanced amateur?) I find myself torn: A condescending "Well it has to be said, that if the users are so stupid that they cannot tell the difference between

It seems to me that apps are still in a terrible state, especially those that run on multiple platforms (for example PHP.) While it may be possible to securely configure such About Christophers case, it can be some code in either the installation packager, which tries to modify a vital system file (to install game drivers or something like that) that the In a typical installation, MS Antivirus runs a scan on the computer and gives a false spyware report claiming that the computer is infected with spyware. BF Skinner • November 11, 2009 7:46 AM @Nomen Solaris is a minority operating There is a difference in the operating enviornment and level of control applied between backoffice servers established

Avast Antivirus

Yes, it's theoretically conceivable that malware could infect a limited user account if it were designed that way, but if it did and was detected in a short amount of time, Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view Follow Geek Tech Movies Games Television Comics Culture Deals Google Is Partnering With Raspberry Pi to Create Artificial IntelligenceCreate Best Free Antivirus AV 2008 wouldn't install on SP1 without a bunch of registry hacks. Avast Free Perhaps, finally, the excuse of letting high-end hardware hide the bloat of poorly programmed software is coming to an end.

While the statement that attackers are targeting legitimate websites is correct, the implication that only a paid product can protect against this scenario is absolutely wrong. his comment is here I am programming myself using VB6, but since for example Avira updated to 8,9,10, almost ALL of my programs cause it to lie about it being a virus. SecureWorks. and you won't notice any performance degradation at all." Perhaps, if you have multi-core processors (i.e. Malwarebytes

Alfonso Maruccia • November 10, 2009 12:00 PM Good point, Bruce, even though I'd recommend Avira AntiVir (both the free and commercial version) instead of AVG for its better detection capabilities Donut Considering the only Antivirus I've used are the ones provided for free either through university or company, I'd have to say price. Glad it resonated with you. this contact form Give them credit; they did stick with it until it was finished.

Are any of them reasonably responsive to false-positive reports? but by doing so , you wont help other users in need of "respect" with their own online behavior ! Now, it runs without problem and to NirSoft's credit, exceedingly well.

My advice is NEVER trust them.

They also added a commend to this post, it's recommended to read it too. What you can do: > For your own safety, please close this web browser window now and never return to this website. > If you still want to see this blocked This is a great chance to use a secondary email address or a gmail filter… frag68 I actually found the e-mail thing came in quite handy once. The more people start using Mac OS X the more these vulnerabilities will be exploited.

Despite being every corporation's favourite hijack, no toolbar was added to Internet Explorer 7, although an IPS Browser Helper Object was installed. i'm service engineer and founder of usetools.net project about free software.experiments and test based on real practical usage show that antivirus software applications become more and more useless, consume the great Password INVADER! http://interasap.net/antivirus-2009/antivirus-2009-gallimp-com-pop-up.html Like others, I don't run AV software on some computer systems, like a dedicated Media Center HTPC, which don't use web browsers and where the only user interface is the remote.

Is every one of your servers serving DNS?" *nix admin "Well no." Me "Take bind off" *nix admin "We don't know what'll happen. At home I just installed W7 and so far haven't had any issues running as standard user. I'm not familiar with either Bit9 Parity or Savant Protection, so perhaps they already do what I'm proposing, and they're still too clunky. We write "entertainment" software that is flagged as viruses by all of the major players.

those antivirus companies really goes too far. frankie Says: March 3rd, 2010 at 8:00 am i love these tools sad to hear that small companies are being target as victims as viruses into there software but the bad This is in NIS 2009 as well and it serves the same function-to identify trusted files and speed up performance by not scanning them if they aren't changed. It is extremely difficult to test the effectiveness of antivirus programs so we'll leave that up to a third-party tester like this one.

Reply Greg Luganus says: February 9, 2009 at 15:17 Very well-placed metaphor to to condoms with Windows. "Microsoft doesn’t make them very easy to put on." I'm quoting this! Look at this chart I've made from the IG report. Once the user starts using the PC again, the scanning process stops almost immediately. Each variant has its own way of downloading and installing itself onto a computer.